Written by Attorney Soobin You, a former prosecutor licensed in Korea, defending criminal cases with consultations available in English.
Quick answer: In Korea, an accusation of groping on crowded public transport can arise from contact that was never intentional. But indecent assault requires intent, and where objective evidence such as CCTV and the positions of the parties contradicts the accusation, a not-guilty verdict is possible. In one such case, a client accused of groping on the subway was acquitted at trial.
For foreigners who commute in Korea, this is a real and frightening risk. On a packed subway or bus, accidental contact happens, and a misunderstanding can turn into a criminal case. Here is how one wrongful accusation was overturned, from a Korean English-speaking lawyer’s perspective.
How these cases arise
The offence usually charged in these cases is Article 11 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment of Sexual Crimes, which covers an indecent act against a person on public transport, at a performance or assembly venue, or anywhere else the public is densely gathered. As the provision now stands — the penalty was last set by the amendment of 19 May 2020 — it carries up to 3 years’ imprisonment or a fine of up to 30 million KRW. A case is judged under the law in force when the conduct took place, so the figures above describe the current provision rather than the sentence range in any particular past case. Two points matter for a foreign national. The range is lower than that for indecent assault under the Criminal Act, but a conviction is still a sexual offence on the record, with ancillary consequences decided separately by the court rather than applied automatically. And because the conduct alleged is brief and physical, the case very often turns on whether contact was deliberate at all — which is a question of evidence, not of how convincing an explanation sounds.
On crowded public transport, unintended contact between passengers is common. But it can be mistaken for indecent assault, and once reported, the person suddenly becomes a suspect. Because these cases often rest heavily on the complainant’s perception and statement, an innocent person can be charged based on a misunderstanding. This is exactly why an objective, evidence-based response is essential.
The case background
The client was accused of touching another passenger’s body on a crowded subway and was charged with indecent assault on public transport. The client firmly stated that any contact was an unavoidable result of the crowding, with no intent whatsoever. But in these cases, asserting a lack of intent is not enough. It must be objectively shown that there was no intentional touching.
The defense strategy: reconstructing the scene with objective evidence
The heart of the case was whether the client had intentionally committed an indecent act. We concentrated on securing and analyzing objective evidence.
We obtained the subway CCTV footage and analyzed the positions of the client and the complainant, the degree of crowding, and the flow of movement. We reconstructed, in objective terms, that any contact in that situation was a natural consequence of the crowding rather than an intentional act. We also analyzed the consistency of the complainant’s account and the reasonableness of the described contact given the actual positions of the parties, presenting the points that were difficult to credit.
Establishing the absence of intent
Indecent assault is not established without intent. We set out, through the CCTV and the objective circumstances, that the client had no intent to commit an indecent act, and that the contact was an unavoidable product of the crowded conditions. In particular, we demonstrated with objective materials that, given the parties’ positions and the situation at the time, intentional touching would have been difficult, which became a decisive basis for the not-guilty verdict.
The result: acquittal
In the end, the court found that it could not be recognized that the client had intentionally committed an indecent act, and returned a verdict of not guilty. This outcome rested on objective evidence such as CCTV and a precise analysis of the circumstances, rather than on assertion alone.
Why the early response matters in these cases
Indecent assault cases on public transport frequently turn on a single moment and a single statement. Contact that was genuinely accidental can be misunderstood, and an emotional or careless response can work against you. This is why securing objective evidence and responding systematically from the earliest stage is so important. In particular, evidence like CCTV that can be lost over time must be secured quickly. If you have been wrongly accused, do not face the investigation alone. Analyzing the objective circumstances and responding with evidence is what protects you.
Accusations made on public transport are decided on CCTV, positioning and timing, and the window in which that footage can still be secured is measured in days rather than weeks. More on defending sex offence allegations in Korea, and on what to do when the police first make contact.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Can accidental contact on a crowded subway lead to a criminal charge in Korea?
A: Yes. Unintended contact can be mistaken for indecent assault and reported, placing an innocent person under investigation. This is why an objective, evidence-based response is important.
Q: How do you prove there was no intent?
A: Through objective evidence such as CCTV footage, the positions of the parties, and the degree of crowding, used to reconstruct that any contact was a natural result of the situation rather than an intentional act.
Q: Why is securing CCTV footage urgent?
A: Because footage like subway CCTV can be lost over time. Securing it quickly can be decisive, since it may be the clearest objective record of what actually happened.
Q: What does a not-guilty verdict mean here?
A: It means the court found the criminal facts, including intent, were not proven. The person is acquitted, with no conviction resulting from the case.
Q: I’m a foreigner accused of this in Korea. Can I get help in English?
A: Yes. A Korean English-speaking lawyer can take your account in English and build an objective, evidence-based defense from the earliest stage, which is critical when footage and the first statement can decide the outcome.
This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Outcomes depend on the specific facts of each case. This is a sensitive legal area. Consult a licensed attorney about your situation.
Falsely accused on public transport in Korea? YUSU Lawfirm (법무법인 유수), founded by former prosecutor Soobin You, with a team that includes Kyungmin Kim, a US-educated Korean attorney, provides English-language criminal defense from the earliest stage. With offices in Seoul (Mapo) and Gyeongju, contact us via KakaoTalk or the inquiry form.
Accused of groping on a train or a bus?
Tell us where it happened, what the complainant says you did, and whether the police have contacted you yet. You do not need to have decided anything before writing.
Tell us about your caseSupport during a police investigation