A case handled by YUSU Lawfirm. Identifying details have been anonymized.
Case at a Glance
- Matter: Occupational embezzlement
- Client: Suspect
- Stage: Retained before the third police interview
- Result: Closed by police without referral (no suspicion)
The Client's Situation
The client was suspected of using company funds for personal purposes and was questioned by police. The alleged amount was large enough that a conviction would likely have meant prison. By the time YUSU Lawfirm was retained, two or more interviews had already taken place and a third was coming up.
Key Legal Issue
The spending itself could not be disputed. The question was whether it served the company and whether there was intent to embezzle, which had to be shown with objective records.
What YUSU Lawfirm Did
Attorney Soobin You reviewed every use of the funds and gathered the client's supporting records. The company's articles of incorporation were analyzed to show the funds could be used for that purpose, and internal rules and past practice were used to show the conduct was justified. Against the company's claim of personal use, the defense showed the company had not raised any issue at the time. A defense opinion was filed for the third interview.
Result
The police closed the case without referral (no suspicion).
What This Case Shows
In embezzlement cases the issue is less that money was spent than whether the spending was allowed. Articles, internal rules and how the company handled similar spending become evidence of intent. Even late in an investigation the outcome can change, though early advice is always better.
Related Legal Services
For how we handle this type of matter, see Police Investigation Support. More outcomes are collected in our Case Results.
Related cases and guides
Facing a similar legal issue in Korea? Tell us what happened and our legal team will review it. Every case turns on its own facts, and this result does not guarantee a similar outcome.